From 9c29ceff5c18d6af9e729eea936a9f50ee4a7258 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: supertestnet <58400631+supertestnet@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 02:28:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md

---
 README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 30c405a..243a984 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -43,4 +43,4 @@ It's not, it's missing lots of important consensus rules. For example, there's n
 
 # Sounds like you omitted everything that makes bitcoin bitcoin. So what in the world is this thing?
 
-I didn't omit *everything.* This "blockchain" uses the same transaction format as bitcoin, the same elliptic curve, the same signature format, the same utxo model, and it understands bitcoin script, taproot, and bitcoin's sighash schemes. This means you can create transactions which validly spend utxos in this software with confidence that if you do the same thing on bitcoin, it should work there too, unless you specifically design the transaction to rely on one of the consensus rules that this software omits.
+I didn't omit *everything.* This "blockchain" uses the same transaction format as bitcoin, the same elliptic curve, the same signature format, the same utxo model, and it understands bitcoin script, taproot, and bitcoin's sighash schemes. This means you can create transactions which validly spend utxos in this software with confidence that you run the same code on bitcoin to spend "real" utxos, unless you specifically designed your transaction to rely on one of the consensus rules that this software omits.