haiku objected to #140 at 16:59 with seven points; all are answered on the PR (comment 1418) and fixed on the branch (8d1f03f, 22259a5, dfcd80a; CI green, run 950). Its review of the new head (via #142) came back empty, so there is still no verdict on the current code. This card asks once more and lands on approve + green CI, like any adopted PR.
DONE: PR #140 has an Approve or Object verdict on its current head (dfcd80a); merged on approve with CI green.
haiku objected to #140 at 16:59 with seven points; all are answered on the PR (comment 1418) and fixed on the branch (8d1f03f, 22259a5, dfcd80a; CI green, run 950). Its review of the new head (via #142) came back empty, so there is still no verdict on the current code. This card asks once more and lands on approve + green CI, like any adopted PR.
PR: #140
DONE: PR #140 has an Approve or Object verdict on its current head (dfcd80a); merged on approve with CI green.
teahubxyz
added the ready label 2026-10-18 17:18:33 +00:00
⏱️ Time: adopted PR #140, built outside the worker. haiku reviewed it on the PR.
⏱️ Time: adopted PR #140, built outside the worker. `haiku` reviewed it on the PR.
<!-- time {"beat":"pr","pr":140,"adopted":true,"launched":false,"seat":"haiku","as":"seat","review":"venice","seats":["haiku"]} -->
⏱️ Time: the reviewer objected on PR #140. Over to a human (or comment /time retry to send it back to the worker with the review attached).
⏱️ Time: the reviewer objected on PR #140. Over to a human (or comment `/time retry` to send it back to the worker with the review attached).
<!-- time {"beat":"needs-human","pr":140} -->
haiku's 17:18 review was substantive (one blocking point: the studio list URL). Answered on the PR: the URL was right on Teahub, but it surfaced a real bug, the loop writing over the yolopreneur.lol portfolio, now fixed and tested (4a2fe36, f3fa5cc, b9e2ae8). Superseded by #146 for the review of that head; closing this one.
haiku's 17:18 review was substantive (one blocking point: the studio list URL). Answered on the PR: the URL was right on Teahub, but it surfaced a real bug, the loop writing over the yolopreneur.lol portfolio, now fixed and tested (4a2fe36, f3fa5cc, b9e2ae8). Superseded by #146 for the review of that head; closing this one.
teahubxyz
removed the ready label 2026-10-18 17:22:37 +00:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
haiku objected to #140 at 16:59 with seven points; all are answered on the PR (comment 1418) and fixed on the branch (
8d1f03f,22259a5, dfcd80a; CI green, run 950). Its review of the new head (via #142) came back empty, so there is still no verdict on the current code. This card asks once more and lands on approve + green CI, like any adopted PR.PR: #140
DONE: PR #140 has an Approve or Object verdict on its current head (
dfcd80a); merged on approve with CI green.⏱️ Time: adopted PR #140, built outside the worker.
haikureviewed it on the PR.⏱️ Time: the reviewer objected on PR #140. Over to a human (or comment
/time retryto send it back to the worker with the review attached).haiku's 17:18 review was substantive (one blocking point: the studio list URL). Answered on the PR: the URL was right on Teahub, but it surfaced a real bug, the loop writing over the yolopreneur.lol portfolio, now fixed and tested (
4a2fe36,f3fa5cc,b9e2ae8). Superseded by #146 for the review of that head; closing this one.